Tuesday, 20 July 2021

Green Room review_attempt_2


 Nazi Punks Fuck Off
is a 1981 single by the American punk band Dead Kennedys. The song lasts only one minute and three seconds long, and yet it left an unimpeachable impression on the emerging anti-fascist organisations and unions such as Anti-Racist Action (ARA), The Anarchist Federation (AFed), as well as on the Virginian director Jeremy Saulnier.


At precisely fourteen minutes and twenty-six seconds into the 2015 film Green Room, the main characters, playing together as the aptly-named band The Ain't Rights, cover Nazi Punks to a room of... Nazi punks. This is the scene that ignites the plot of the film, unspooling the horrific events that follow it out before the viewer in an almost pre-ordained line. 

This reading was brought up in an interview between Saulnier and Modern Horrors' Jason Almenas, where Almenas prompts Saulnier to discuss how this scene, and indeed the song choice, kick the film's plot into gear: 'You know it could be argued that it’s almost a jailhouse posturing like when you show a bit of aggression you get some respect, that’s what they basically did by playing Nazi Punks...' (Almenas and Saulnier, 2016) Saulnier is more than entitled to his rejection of said reading, although I do find it rich that he would so thoroughly dismiss it, seeing as his approach to filmmaking is very much built on the specific details and contexts brought with every music, clothing or casting choice. I initially read Saulnier's hand-waving as him having some small fun as the "auteur", knowing fully well that his say would typically be the last on the topic; after all, he did direct the film!


Films convey information, and the information conveyed with the choice to use Nazi Punks, beyond a sardonically humourous one, is to intimidate and raise a middle finger to the white supremacist crowd before the band. Quite literally telling the antagonists of the film to fuck off hardly fourteen minutes into the film is a bold choice to make for a narrative, and one that spurs on the main thrust of the film; being locked and held hostage within the titular green room. 

Choice plays a major role in the fiction of the film, as my original review mentions quite a bit, parroting the views of critics who gave the film a surface-level reading, informing my own to be nothing more than a cobbled together, and illegible detailing of an already exhausted talking point. I chose to write the review in that way, and I'm choosing now to disregard that way of thinking here, just as Saulnier chose to disregard an interpretation of his own work. The choice in craft and the choice in narrative are dissimilar and similar things, deliberating on what choices the characters will make reflects the choice of how to block the scene they're in to effectively convey it. Green Room utilises both aspects in its own choice making, often hiding details in its foreground to connote or denote fascist imagery; text saying 'deus vult' and 'they will not replace us', Nazi and Confederate flags and most other right-libertarian tells are pasted across every inch of the Mise-en-scène. This interestingly contrasts with the iconography and Mise-en-scène that surrounds The Ain't Rights.

It'd be expected that, taken the Nazi image portrayal circling the antagonists, that the imagery surrounding our protagonists are those of anti-racism, anti-fascism and anarchy, but this isn't quite the case. The Mise-en-scène that surrounds the main characters typically depict (aside from the aforementioned fascist imagery) fairly generic punk and heavy metal symbols and texts. The Ain't Rights aren't afforded nearly as much attention for their own core values, both explicitly in the script or implicitly in the visuals. This directly ties back to Saulnier's interesting take on the igniting Nazi Punks scene, as his reading of it feels more like an "apolitical" back-tracking and finger-wagging at the more politically-conscious reviewer's own take, again contrasting with the VERY political and overtly anti-fascist nature of the song, the scene and the film itself. Saulnier's approach to this take and to the overt nature of punk/anti-fascist culture is interesting in that he appears (in the media portraying his ideals in this way) to be deliberately shutting down any left-wing perspective on a left-wing film.


Whether Jeremy Saulnier is a left-leaning centrist or a liberal simply using the language and iconography of leftist speakers and communities isn't all that important, in the end. The point of his film and the point of including a song like Nazi Punks Fuck Off is to be very obviously anti-fascist, and if that point is being made by a non-leftist, or by a group of filmmakers intent on staying "apolitical", then the end result is a far greater achievement than what they had intended, as Saulnier said himself, to do.



Bibliography: 

Almenas, J. and Saulnier, J., 2016. Q&A: Director Jeremy Saulnier Talks ‘Green Room’. [online] Modern Horrors. Available at: <https://modernhorrors.com/qa-jeremy-saulnier-talks-green-room/> [Accessed 12 July 2021].

Biafra, J. (1981). Nazi Punks Fuck Off. [Single]. City: San Fransisco, CA. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMlsXy3WuxM [Accessed 12 July 2021].

Green Room (2015) Directed by Jeremey Saulnier. [Blu-Ray, 5060105724015].

Friday, 18 June 2021

I'm not who I was

 It's almost been another year again. I'm not who I was.

I'm trans now, so that's a new one. Oh, and I'm non-binary, too. And an anarcho-communist. And am in a poly relationship with two unrealistically lovely people ...and I've just finished my second year of my Fine Art degree. 

And I'm the happiest I've ever been.


I have time on my hands again, and time to be less anxious about having to write essays condensing my opinions on things I love into them. So instead of doing that at uni, I'll do that on my tiny little blog that's been dead for almost an exact year.

This is just a preface, I want to start new again. I'm gonna keep everything up, as much as I may hate or disagree with my past posts. But this time I want to stay true to myself; no forcing opinions, no trying to appease certain people with the topics I cover, nothing like that. Just a fun blog about things that interest or excite me.

Welcome back.

Friday, 19 June 2020

Doctor Who Season 26 Serial 2: Ghost Light [review]

The light returns to 80s Doctor Who.


Further proof of the magic that finally returned to Doctor Who after a long battle with mediocrity through most of the late 70s and early 80s. Seasons 25 and 26 introduced some of the most complex concepts of all of Classic Who with hardly a fault (save for large chunks of Silver Nemesis).


Ghost Light is a complicated beast, put succinctly in Martin Day, Keith Topping and Paul Cornell's The Discontinuity Guide '...in order to appreciate fully what's going on it is probably necessary to watch Ghost Light two or three times.' This is true to some degree, but there is more than enough to garner from the story on first viewing. This is a story that competently tackles a myriad of ideas and even interpretations of the Doctor Who mythos, something that almost NEVER works in the classic series. Ideas such as "Light" and "Control" being real, physical beings that can interact and exist to us is handled incredibly well, focusing these characters into depictions of Victorian values that, up until this point in the show, weren't as thoroughly demolished through criticism and light scepticism of their ideals and standards (something the modern show has excelled at, as of late).


The relatively short serial tackles a really interesting combination of metaphor-as-narrative storytelling and the darker, but still light and bubbly tone of the McCoy era, which fold onto each other in ways that don't often get presented in the show, let alone most shows.


The continuation of Season 26's ethos of "develop Ace more with each episode" isn't as strong as in the next serial (it's hard to compare anything with The Curse of Fenric, so it's hardly an issue), but there are further glimpses of Ace's clear flaws in an almost setting up of an arc to be followed through and completed in the final two serials.


McCoy's Doctor does exude an air of omniscience in this story, although more towards the final moments, which aligns with the unused ideas of The Doctor's God-like abilities being fleshed out for the unmade Season 27, but in this case this image of the doctor as the manipulator and the all-knowing all-seeing force of nature works into the favour of the serial, as if the overall story is punctuated by Gods and humans, the former battling it out for control, and the latter trying to simply get out alive, back into the light.

Friday, 17 May 2019

Let's talk about DAMN. (2017)

Let's talk about:



BOO! GOOD KID, M.A.A.D CITY IS BETTER! DAMN IS KENDRICK'S WORST ALBUM! BOO!


Ok so yeah, DAMN. is a 2016 hip hop album written by, produced by and performed by Kendrick Lamar. It also happens to be his best album so far.
I think it's important to acknowledge an artist's body of work when taking into account their latest release, and Kendrick's is a mammoth compared to those who own maybe just a small elk.

Kenny's body of work consists of four studio albums, five mixtapes, one compilation album and forty- three singles.
His most well- renowned piece, To Pimp a Butterfly (2015) was released to immense critical acclaim, which it still gets to this day, more so, some might say, since DAMN. was released.

Kendrick's style is often coined by his references to Compton (his childhood city), instrumental jazz accompaniment to the vocals and his use of the medium to empower the black persons of the United States who have endured what Kendrick has.
DAMN. is almost none of these.
DAMN. was, I think, so different to Kenny's first three albums that the majority of his long- time fans were not able to deal with the radical gear shift in tone and style.

DAMN. uses K. Dot's past works as a backbone to subvert expectations for the genre, as well as to subvert expectations for a Kendrick Lamar album. Why do this, though? Why do this after an album as conceptually thought out and constructed as TPAB?
Well, Kendrick created DAMN. in an effort to address his past work and to move forward in his creative field.

The album is a response, a wall for Kendrick to bounce his personal issues against and a vessel to reach an audience larger than previously reached.
Kendrick's veer away from Compton as a main concept, or location to ground the story of the album in, is a whiplash- inducing event, a change that's almost instantly recogniseable on first listens. The choice to move his attention away from the inner world of Compton, and onto the wider world around us all is a step away from one phase of Kenny's career, and into the next.

DAMN. uses this step away to appeal to a wider audience and to address issues that could only fit into an album such as DAMN.
The sound of the album is noticeably less jazz influenced when compared to TPAB, and less culture- based, opting, instead, to address the mainstream, in a move to create a personal piece that anybody can relate to.
I, personally, can't relate to Section.80 (2011), Good Kid, M.A.A.D City (2012), or To Pimp a Butterfly as well as I can DAMN. This is because of Kendrick pushing his style and conceptual approaches outside of the niche market of his past work, and into said mainstream. Kenny addresses issues I have, thoughts I have and concerns I have, which engage me better in the narrative of the record.

An argument can be made for the likes of GKMC and TPAB showing me a world I don't fully understand, and relaying the atrocities and deviances of these places in the everyday life of the populous. This argument is true in that this has occurred for me, but while I am more knowledgeable on the political and social struggles of Compton, Compton is still only one city, and not the one the rest of the planet grew up in.

DAMN. knows when to keep the pace within Kendrick's childhood home and his thoughts on the world outside of it. This is all the reason why I believe this to be Kendrick's best album. This is an outstandingly dark and cynical outlook that is, yes, explored in previous albums, but never to this extent. This is because of how K. Dot was feeling at the time of making it, again, this album is a way for him to truly bring out his personal demons that built up over 2016.

The overall message of the album, for me, concludes that we as people cannot exist without a balance of wickedness and weakness within our souls, having too much of one or the other will kill you, as has happened with Kendrick's friends back in Compton, illustrated in song throughout TPAD and GKMC. Kendrick uses DAMN. to reveal how and why those whom he held dear to his heart were killed, and how we can all use those awfully tragic moments as learning points to become better people, and to avoid such grisly fates so young in our lives.

"Is it wickedness?
Is it weakness?
You decide
Are we gonna live or die?"


What kept me going through this review: Kendrick Lamar - DAMN., Flying Lotus - You're Dead!, Posij - Cocoon and Eastghost - Misery & Wonder.

Saturday, 2 June 2018

Doctor Who Season 5 Serial 5: The Web of Fear [review]

Ok so I'm not adding anything of worth to my blog lately, sorry.
The last good thing I did was that small David Fincher retrospective, I know..

So basically I'm gonna start doing reviews of an episode of Doctor Who I watch once I'm done with it.
I watch the damn show enough to have these be coming out twice weekly, in theory, but obviously I won't be doing that (although maybe later in summer, who knows).

(Also these are never gonna be in chronological order, sorry)

So, The Web of Fear is a relatively new story to me, only being released on DVD in early 2014 (another thing to add to the list of good that year), but regardless it has become one of my all-time favourites of the era. Not to mention one of Troughton's best out of a line of great serials.

Even though we only have tele-snaps of the missing third episode (no introduction for poor Nicholas Courtney) to go by when judging it, it;s still apparent the whole serial is an incredible achievement.

Among these special things is how surprisingly mature and clever the writing is in this serial; we get lots of memorable banter from the Doctor and his companions, but also from the strong female supporting character and many of the soldiers. There are so many twists and turns in the story that are just as impressive and completely caught me off guard on first viewing.

The atmosphere is another aspect I think of as ahead of its time considering the amount of attention this would get back in the 60's normally.
All of the location filming never wastes an opportunity to flaunt that THEY'RE ACTUALLY REALLY FILMING IN THE REAL LONDON UNDERGROUND EVERYBODY LIKE THEY GOT PERMISSION TO DO THIS, which is quite nice as none of that is wasted (something which did happen a lot back then). Every scene set in the labyrinthine tunnels, be it genuine or just a set, is clouded in a tangible mood that had never come before it.

So as to not spoil the ending, we basically get an anti- climax that feels somehow satisfying in its subversion and general tone. Again, this isn't something that happened regularly, and it feels so much more special than another typical 'turn the enemy's plan against themselves and then everything's completely fine afterwards' ending; instead this feels different, bittersweet and even a bit nuanced.
Which could also be said for the whole story, really.

Here's just some things that I want to call out for just being great: the classic, Hammer- esque intro scene, the whole who- dunnit mystery in the last three episodes, Anne and Professor Travers and their character development and interactions, Jimmy Court and Alan Jonas nailing the cinematography, the fantastic use of public domain music and:
Victoria: Well, where are we?
The Doctor: I really don't know, Victoria. Shall we go out and have a look?
Victoria: Now?! Is it safe?
The Doctor: Oh, I shouldn't think so for a moment..